Things are moving along, slowly but surely. In my spare time, to help stay abreast of current information, I've been listening to a lot of podcasts. I thought I'd mention a few here.
First, Patricia McConnell. She used to have a radio show on Wisconsin Public Radio. I would listen every week when we lived in Wisconsin. After moving back to Missouri I had to download it. Oh, the disappointment one Monday morning when I discovered that the show had been cancelled. However, WPR has graciously left her last several episodes on their website and they are still available for download at... Well, in my attempt to grab the link, I discovered the WPR has now taken down the audio archives of the show. Fortunately I have them on my computer, but that doesn't help you, the reader. I'll keep digging around to see if I can find them somewhere else.
Second, Victoria Stilwell Positively Podcast. I love this woman because, looking at her television shows in particular, you can see how much she has changed over the years. She is constantly educating herself to keep up with new research and information and adjusting her training to incorporate the new information. The scheduling and runs of her podcasts are a bit odd and unpredictable, but they are always informative. All the episodes, through season three, are available at http://positively.com/podcasts/
Finally (for now), my new favorite is In the Dog House with Nando Brown and Donna Saunders. This is a weekly radio show out of Spain. Not to worry, it's in English. Each week this two hour show has three or four of the top people in the field from all over the world as guests. My favorite part is each episode, they try to have member from the Pet Professional Guild on. Being a member of the PPG, it's nice to be able to put voice with the faces I constantly communicate with on forums and Facebook. Always an interesting show, even if the banter gets a little sophomoric sometimes, although not to the point of distraction. This is a radio show though, so be prepared to listen to or fast forward through unrelated commercials and some songs, if you don't like the music. An extensive archive is available at http://inthedoghousedtc.com/category/pet-radio
These are excellent for listening to while walking your dog, doing house work, or while at work, if time allows. Enjoy.
Hopefully by next week, I'll have finally finished the book I'm reading and will have a review and/or comments on it. I'm finally getting to the meat of the book and hate having to step away from it.
Friday, May 10, 2013
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Back on track
Well, a lot has been going on. I closed the business and had to find a new job. I at least have a paycheck coming in, but it's time to get things back on track.
Then the birth of my second daughter. There were a few complications. Nothing major, but time consuming. We're finally settling into a routine, and now it's time to get things back on track.
I'm still looking for a career, not just a job. By trade, I'm a graphic artist/desktop publisher. I can do the job and do it well, but the market here is very competitive, and with the journalism school at the university, companies can get cheap, temporary labor. They don't see the benefit of a long-term employee who knows the business and knows it well or just want to succeed, but not excel... so is my viewpoint. I won't go any deeper into that as this blog is about dogs and not the economic state of my city. However, it is time to look at my priorities and find a balance between my career and my passion. Not just from an fiscal standpoint, but for my sanity as well.
So, to that end, I'm getting back to my original plan. First, my book. I've had my sketchpad sitting on my end table for a year or more now. I think it's time to get that done. Most of the reference art is done. I just need to scan it and set it up for printing.
With that, I need to go through the text and make sure it is still up to date. So many new studies have come out, I need to make sure all the information is current. This means reading the studies and making sure I understand them to the point that I can explain it to my daughter, who the book is written for.
Next, my whole intention when I became a trainer was to train. I enjoy the group classes I do at CCSC and plan on being there for a while yet, but I want to do private lessons where I can tailor the class to the individual needs, one at a time. This will also lead, as has been my plan, into behavior modification (aggression, fear, etc.). I have an understanding of the theory and practice, but no formal education and minimal hands on experience.
Finally, this blog. I have so much information I'd like to share and really need to get back to consistently posting. I truly believe that I am standing on the shoulders of giants. I have made so many connections with people who have been doing this longer than me and, truth be told, better than me, I want to help get their information out there. This entails reading the books, studies, and conversations, putting that information in layman's terms, and providing access to the original information so people can make their own inferences.
So there's my plan. Not only to share with others, but to hopefully give me the kick in the pants I need to get these things done. I'll keep you posted on how things are progressing and hopefully provide some useful information to boot. I haven't been totally complacent and will have some things to share in the coming days and weeks, including a letter to a local shelter and a review of a book about trainer/people interactions.
Then the birth of my second daughter. There were a few complications. Nothing major, but time consuming. We're finally settling into a routine, and now it's time to get things back on track.
I'm still looking for a career, not just a job. By trade, I'm a graphic artist/desktop publisher. I can do the job and do it well, but the market here is very competitive, and with the journalism school at the university, companies can get cheap, temporary labor. They don't see the benefit of a long-term employee who knows the business and knows it well or just want to succeed, but not excel... so is my viewpoint. I won't go any deeper into that as this blog is about dogs and not the economic state of my city. However, it is time to look at my priorities and find a balance between my career and my passion. Not just from an fiscal standpoint, but for my sanity as well.
So, to that end, I'm getting back to my original plan. First, my book. I've had my sketchpad sitting on my end table for a year or more now. I think it's time to get that done. Most of the reference art is done. I just need to scan it and set it up for printing.
With that, I need to go through the text and make sure it is still up to date. So many new studies have come out, I need to make sure all the information is current. This means reading the studies and making sure I understand them to the point that I can explain it to my daughter, who the book is written for.
Next, my whole intention when I became a trainer was to train. I enjoy the group classes I do at CCSC and plan on being there for a while yet, but I want to do private lessons where I can tailor the class to the individual needs, one at a time. This will also lead, as has been my plan, into behavior modification (aggression, fear, etc.). I have an understanding of the theory and practice, but no formal education and minimal hands on experience.
Finally, this blog. I have so much information I'd like to share and really need to get back to consistently posting. I truly believe that I am standing on the shoulders of giants. I have made so many connections with people who have been doing this longer than me and, truth be told, better than me, I want to help get their information out there. This entails reading the books, studies, and conversations, putting that information in layman's terms, and providing access to the original information so people can make their own inferences.
So there's my plan. Not only to share with others, but to hopefully give me the kick in the pants I need to get these things done. I'll keep you posted on how things are progressing and hopefully provide some useful information to boot. I haven't been totally complacent and will have some things to share in the coming days and weeks, including a letter to a local shelter and a review of a book about trainer/people interactions.
Monday, August 27, 2012
New Age Mumbo Jumbo
Between a new job and a baby on the way, I haven't been too good at keeping up with this. I'll try to do better.
I got in a discussion this weekend about "energy," as heard on one of my least favorite trainer's tv shows. I hold the strong opinion of if you can't explain something so it is understood by your grandparent or a child, you don't truly understand it yourself. So, in a word, like so many other things, said tv "trainer" doesn't know what he's talking about.
What's actually happening is all about body language. Dogs communicate predominately through body language: stance, ears, tail, lips, mouth, etc. Likewise, they pick up on our body language. Although dogs have to learn a lot about how to communicate, there are some things that cross species.
When two people meet, it is polite to face the person, make eye contact, extend a hand to shake, or hug if the person is very familiar to you. Dogs see most of these things as a threat, intimidating, or just plain rude. When dogs approach each other, they approach at an angle, they avoid direct eye contact for any length of time, they stand side by side, head to tail until they are comfortable with each other. I am only using social meetings here where the outcome is both parties are at ease with each other.
This relates to "energy" in that the aforementioned tv "trainer"walks up to the dog directly, stares at him, hovers over him, and basically does everything he can as a person to intimidate the dogs. When I had the store and in my classes, when I approach a dog for the first time, I turn sideways to them, I squat down to make myself as non-threatening as possible, I don't make direct eye contact, I wait for the dog to approach me. On numerous occasions people have commented that their dog hardly ever approaches strangers or doesn't like strangers and how surprised they are the dog was choosing to interact with me. (This, of course is all after I have asked the owner if I can pet their dog.)
So there it is in a nutshell: "energy" = body language. The thing to keep in mind after all this is if you approach a dog in an intimidating manner, the dog is much more likely to either go the other way or, if he feels he can't get away (is on a leach, in a yard, etc.) the dog is more likely to retaliate, even to the point of biting.
I got in a discussion this weekend about "energy," as heard on one of my least favorite trainer's tv shows. I hold the strong opinion of if you can't explain something so it is understood by your grandparent or a child, you don't truly understand it yourself. So, in a word, like so many other things, said tv "trainer" doesn't know what he's talking about.
What's actually happening is all about body language. Dogs communicate predominately through body language: stance, ears, tail, lips, mouth, etc. Likewise, they pick up on our body language. Although dogs have to learn a lot about how to communicate, there are some things that cross species.
When two people meet, it is polite to face the person, make eye contact, extend a hand to shake, or hug if the person is very familiar to you. Dogs see most of these things as a threat, intimidating, or just plain rude. When dogs approach each other, they approach at an angle, they avoid direct eye contact for any length of time, they stand side by side, head to tail until they are comfortable with each other. I am only using social meetings here where the outcome is both parties are at ease with each other.
This relates to "energy" in that the aforementioned tv "trainer"walks up to the dog directly, stares at him, hovers over him, and basically does everything he can as a person to intimidate the dogs. When I had the store and in my classes, when I approach a dog for the first time, I turn sideways to them, I squat down to make myself as non-threatening as possible, I don't make direct eye contact, I wait for the dog to approach me. On numerous occasions people have commented that their dog hardly ever approaches strangers or doesn't like strangers and how surprised they are the dog was choosing to interact with me. (This, of course is all after I have asked the owner if I can pet their dog.)
So there it is in a nutshell: "energy" = body language. The thing to keep in mind after all this is if you approach a dog in an intimidating manner, the dog is much more likely to either go the other way or, if he feels he can't get away (is on a leach, in a yard, etc.) the dog is more likely to retaliate, even to the point of biting.
Sunday, July 8, 2012
About the new blog
I just wanted to write a quick word about the blog and it's name, for clarification.
Blogger.com was nice enough to allow me to move everything from the business site to a new site, now that the business is closed. There are still a few things relevant to the business, but I'll probably take those down eventually.
As for the name, there was a mosaic uncovered in 1824, in what has become known as "The House of the Tragic Poet"... or at the entrance. It was some of the earliest evidence, when it was uncovered, how early dogs were used for specific functions other than hunting. The mosaic is of a growling, chained dog with the words "Cave Canem" under it. The house where it was uncovered dates back to the 2nd Century BC. After the discovery, several similar mosaics were uncovered.
Blogger.com was nice enough to allow me to move everything from the business site to a new site, now that the business is closed. There are still a few things relevant to the business, but I'll probably take those down eventually.
As for the name, there was a mosaic uncovered in 1824, in what has become known as "The House of the Tragic Poet"... or at the entrance. It was some of the earliest evidence, when it was uncovered, how early dogs were used for specific functions other than hunting. The mosaic is of a growling, chained dog with the words "Cave Canem" under it. The house where it was uncovered dates back to the 2nd Century BC. After the discovery, several similar mosaics were uncovered.
Reading List
I didn't come to training with a mind set and looked for evidence to back up that position. when I started out, I believed in the alpha hierarchy and punishment, etc. But I read everything I could get my hands on and kept up with the current research. I think that's the difference between me and trainers I don't care for. Here is a list of books well worth reading for the most current research and understanding. I've put and asterisk (*) next to what I call the short list. These are the books I would recommend starting with if your time or funds are short.
These are books for just understanding learning and behavior:
These four are on every trainer-that-is-worth-their-salt's bookshelf:
*Coercion and its Fallout by Murray Sidman
*The Culture Clash by Jean Donaldson
The Domestic Dog by James Serpell
Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution by Raymond Coppinger and Lorna Coppinger
These are REALLY good, but not as widely known:
Learning and Behavior by Paul Chance
Canine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians by Bonnie Beaver
Dog Sense: How the New Science of Dog Behavior can Make You a Better Friend to Your Dog by John Bradshaw
Actual training books:
These two, again, are on every good trainer's bookshelf:
*Don't Shoot the Dog: The New Art of Teaching and Training by Karen Pryor
Getting Started: Clicker Training for Dogs by Karen Pryor
Not as well known, but I found them very helpful:
The Thinking Dog: Crossover to Clicker Training by Gail Tamases Fisher
Family Friendly Dog Training: A Six Week Program for You and Your Dog by Patricia McConnell and Aimee M. Moore
Puppy Training by Patricia McConnell and Brenda Skidmore
For specific behavior problems and understanding dog communication, I highly recommend:
The Language of Dogs by Sarah Kalnaj (DVD)
For the Love of a Dog by Patricia McConnell
The Other End of the Leash by Patricia McConnell
(Patricia McConnell also has a number of reasonably price booklet that deal with separation anxiety, multidog households, and a number of other problem behaviors.)
Jean Donaldson has a great video (I think 6 parts) on Youtube about dog body language - Dog Body Language by Jean Donaldson (Part 1) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VmWizZueFQ
These are books for just understanding learning and behavior:
These four are on every trainer-that-is-worth-their-salt's bookshelf:
*Coercion and its Fallout by Murray Sidman
*The Culture Clash by Jean Donaldson
The Domestic Dog by James Serpell
Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution by Raymond Coppinger and Lorna Coppinger
These are REALLY good, but not as widely known:
Learning and Behavior by Paul Chance
Canine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians by Bonnie Beaver
Dog Sense: How the New Science of Dog Behavior can Make You a Better Friend to Your Dog by John Bradshaw
Actual training books:
These two, again, are on every good trainer's bookshelf:
*Don't Shoot the Dog: The New Art of Teaching and Training by Karen Pryor
Getting Started: Clicker Training for Dogs by Karen Pryor
Not as well known, but I found them very helpful:
The Thinking Dog: Crossover to Clicker Training by Gail Tamases Fisher
Family Friendly Dog Training: A Six Week Program for You and Your Dog by Patricia McConnell and Aimee M. Moore
Puppy Training by Patricia McConnell and Brenda Skidmore
For specific behavior problems and understanding dog communication, I highly recommend:
The Language of Dogs by Sarah Kalnaj (DVD)
For the Love of a Dog by Patricia McConnell
The Other End of the Leash by Patricia McConnell
(Patricia McConnell also has a number of reasonably price booklet that deal with separation anxiety, multidog households, and a number of other problem behaviors.)
Jean Donaldson has a great video (I think 6 parts) on Youtube about dog body language - Dog Body Language by Jean Donaldson (Part 1) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VmWizZueFQ
Saturday, July 7, 2012
Dominance... again
I get so tired of seeing the same tripe spewed by people from a totally outdated understanding of interactions between dogs and people. Let me put it this way:
First, if dogs were "dominate," as it has come to be defined, when they were first being domesticated, the dominate dog would most likely have been killed or driven off. Second, dogs in the wild are scavengers. They do not form packs but only form "temporary alliances" usually lasting only a few days at most. Third, if dogs are descended from wolves and retain wolf like traits (which would get way to scientific and be way too long to discuss here), wolves' packs are formed by a mating pair and their offspring. Once the offspring reach sexual maturity, they leave to form their own packs. There is no struggle for a place in the hierarchy or for dominance. It just doesn't happen.
Even the popularized "Alpha Roll" is totally misunderstood. Dogs and wolves simply don't do it. What is being seen is one dog voluntarily rolling over to another one. This is a way of saying "I'm totally at ease with you" or "We're just playing and I'm no real threat" among other things. But the dog rolling over volunteers the behavior.
Dominance, as science has defined it, is not a personality trait, but an aspect of a relationship. What that means is a dog is not dominant until another dog submits in a specific situation. For example, my two dogs, Puck and Duncan, come upon a tennis ball. Duncan is crazy about tennis balls and wants this one a lot. To avoid conflict or because he just doesn't care, Puck will submit to Duncan, in this case making Duncan the dominant one. Later, they come upon a mole. Puck is a terrier and loves to dig for them if they get in our yard. In this instance, Duncan will defer to Puck making Puck the dominant one.
If it matters to you, remember that you control the door, you control the food and water. Thus you are the dominate one. However, if you see your life with your dog as going to be a constant struggle for dominance, why even have a dog?
First, if dogs were "dominate," as it has come to be defined, when they were first being domesticated, the dominate dog would most likely have been killed or driven off. Second, dogs in the wild are scavengers. They do not form packs but only form "temporary alliances" usually lasting only a few days at most. Third, if dogs are descended from wolves and retain wolf like traits (which would get way to scientific and be way too long to discuss here), wolves' packs are formed by a mating pair and their offspring. Once the offspring reach sexual maturity, they leave to form their own packs. There is no struggle for a place in the hierarchy or for dominance. It just doesn't happen.
Even the popularized "Alpha Roll" is totally misunderstood. Dogs and wolves simply don't do it. What is being seen is one dog voluntarily rolling over to another one. This is a way of saying "I'm totally at ease with you" or "We're just playing and I'm no real threat" among other things. But the dog rolling over volunteers the behavior.
Dominance, as science has defined it, is not a personality trait, but an aspect of a relationship. What that means is a dog is not dominant until another dog submits in a specific situation. For example, my two dogs, Puck and Duncan, come upon a tennis ball. Duncan is crazy about tennis balls and wants this one a lot. To avoid conflict or because he just doesn't care, Puck will submit to Duncan, in this case making Duncan the dominant one. Later, they come upon a mole. Puck is a terrier and loves to dig for them if they get in our yard. In this instance, Duncan will defer to Puck making Puck the dominant one.
If it matters to you, remember that you control the door, you control the food and water. Thus you are the dominate one. However, if you see your life with your dog as going to be a constant struggle for dominance, why even have a dog?
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Training duration and frequency
I just finished reading an interesting paper on how often you should train. I mean I literally just finished it, so I may have some other thoughts later.
This study was just published a little over a month ago, and it has lit up a lot of the discussion boards I'm on. I believe it is an important study in that it is the first real look at how often you should train your dog for the optimum acquisition of a behavior, but the biggest flaw - which was discussed at length on one of the boards - is that the dogs used were laboratory animals used for drug testing that did not have the same stimulus as a household pet, for example.
That being said, to put my interpretation to the findings, it shows that it is just as important for the dogs to have time to process the information they have learned as the training session themselves. What the study found was that one session, one time a week showed the best acquisition of the behavior. The worst were the dogs who were trained in three back to back sessions every day.
My initial thoughts are pretty much the same as before I read the study, although I may have other ideas as I think over what I've read. Particularly when you first start training your dog, keep the sessions short. I recommend in my puppy classes that you start with about five minute training sessions once a day. Always keep an eye on your dogs stress and frustration level and if they are getting too stressed, frustrated, or distracted, stop. Once the dog starts getting used to the training you can extend the time, although I usually don't recommend going over 15 minutes. Also, once they start to figure out the training process, you may be able to train two or three times a day.
Unfortunately, we can't draw any definite conclusions until more research is done, but this is a start. For the time being, keep your training sessions short, fun, and be aware of the state of your dog. If he's not having fun, stop and come back to it later.
Demant, H., et al., The effect of frequency and duration of training sessions on acquisition and long-term memory in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.010
This study was just published a little over a month ago, and it has lit up a lot of the discussion boards I'm on. I believe it is an important study in that it is the first real look at how often you should train your dog for the optimum acquisition of a behavior, but the biggest flaw - which was discussed at length on one of the boards - is that the dogs used were laboratory animals used for drug testing that did not have the same stimulus as a household pet, for example.
That being said, to put my interpretation to the findings, it shows that it is just as important for the dogs to have time to process the information they have learned as the training session themselves. What the study found was that one session, one time a week showed the best acquisition of the behavior. The worst were the dogs who were trained in three back to back sessions every day.
My initial thoughts are pretty much the same as before I read the study, although I may have other ideas as I think over what I've read. Particularly when you first start training your dog, keep the sessions short. I recommend in my puppy classes that you start with about five minute training sessions once a day. Always keep an eye on your dogs stress and frustration level and if they are getting too stressed, frustrated, or distracted, stop. Once the dog starts getting used to the training you can extend the time, although I usually don't recommend going over 15 minutes. Also, once they start to figure out the training process, you may be able to train two or three times a day.
Unfortunately, we can't draw any definite conclusions until more research is done, but this is a start. For the time being, keep your training sessions short, fun, and be aware of the state of your dog. If he's not having fun, stop and come back to it later.
Demant, H., et al., The effect of frequency and duration of training sessions on acquisition and long-term memory in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)